Oh yes, agreed in spades Gary.
I was already aware of the exorbitant 15% fee involved in using it, but the revelations about its poor performance were particularly eye-opening for me. That, along with the product continuing to default to blocking other (more efficient) crypto mining solutions while only allowing its own, was also very interesting.
I'm curious if the Avira product will be the same, but with no means of testing it without a purchase, I can only assume it's likely to be the same story because that, too, is also owned by Nortons.
I've never been a big fan of Norton solutions and have removed even the AV from countless computers over the years because of the negative performance hit they caused. This, though, takes it to a whole new level.
I can't even begin to fathom the additional damage Nortons have done to their already poor reputation by introducing this latest so-called 'feature'.
Amazing!
